Identifying patients with diagnosed cirrhosis in administrative health databases: a validation study.

Objectives: Case ascertainment algorithms were developed and validated to identify people living with cirrhosis in administrative health data in Manitoba, Canada using primary care electronic medical records (EMR) to define the reference standards. Methods: We linked provincial administrative health data to primary care EMR data. The validation cohort included 116,675 Manitobans aged >18 years with at least one primary care visit between April 1998 and March 2015. Hospital records, physician billing claims, vital statistics, and prescription drug data were used to develop and test 93 case-finding algorithms. A validated case definition for primary care EMR data was the reference standard. We estimated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), Youden's index, area under the receiver operative curve, and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 116,675 people were in the validation cohort. The prevalence of cirrhosis was 1.4% (n = 1593). Algorithm sensitivity estimates ranged from 32.5% (95% CI 32.2-32.8) to 68.3% (95% CI 68.0-68.9) and PPV from 17.4% (95% CI 17.1-17.6) to 23.4% (95% CI 23.1-23.6). Specificity (95.5-98.2) and NPV (approximately 99%) were high for all algorithms. The algorithms had slightly higher sensitivity estimates among men compared with women, and individuals aged ≥45 years compared to those aged 18-44 years. Conclusion: Cirrhosis algorithms applied to administrative health data had moderate validity when a validated case definition for primary care EMRs was the reference standard. This study provides algorithms for identifying diagnosed cirrhosis cases for population-based research and surveillance studies.

Temporal Trends in Practice Patterns After Introduction of Pediatric Hypertension Guidelines in Canada.

Importance: In 2016 and 2017, respectively, new Canadian and US guidelines for diagnosis and management of pediatric hypertension (HTN) were published. Six years after their publication, it is unknown whether the recommendations have led to changes in primary care practice patterns. Objectives: To determine whether HTN guidelines are associated with changes in practice patterns among primary care clinicians. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multicenter, population-based cohort study was conducted across 3 phases: January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2015 (era 1), January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017 (washout period), and January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019 (era 2). Data were collected from 7 Canadian provinces using the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network Electronic Medical Record database. Eligible participants included children and adolescents (aged ≥3 to <18 years) with 1 or more encounters in the database. Data analysis was conducted from February 2022 to February 2023. Exposure: Implementation of the 2016 Hypertension Canada and 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were annual BP screening documentation, high BP follow-up documentation at 6 months and 1-year, HTN prevalence, laboratory testing rates, and medication prescription rates. Interrupted time series analysis was used to assess the association of the introduction of the Canadian and US guidelines with outcomes. Results: The study included 343 191 children and adolescents (mean [SD] age at first encounter, 6.7 (4.6) years; 173 290 female [50.5%]; 169 901 male [49.5%]), including 235 094 patients in era 1 and 193 473 patients in era 2. In era 1, 55 550 patients (23.6%) had at least 1 BP measurement, and in era 2, 45 006 patients (23.3%) had at least 1 BP measurement. There was a significant increase in BP screening in era 2 from 26 876 of 148 554 screenings (18.1%) to 28 556 of 141 192 screenings (20.2%; ß = 0.202; 95% CI, 0.009 to 0.390; P = .04), and the increasing trend was sustained. There was a significant decrease in the trend of follow-up of high BP measurement at 6 months (1265 of 4941 patients with BP measurements [25.6%] to 1718 of 7321 patients with BP measurements [23.5%]; ß = -0.490; 95% CI, -0.758 to -0.223; P = .001) and 1 year (1974 of 4941 measurements [40.0%] to 2314 of 7321 measurements [31.6%]; ß = -1.392; 95% CI, -1.573 to -1.212; P < .001) in era 2. The proportion of patients meeting HTN criteria significantly increased from 2540 of 55 550 patients (4.6%) in era 1 to 5690 of 45 006 patients (12.6%) in era 2 (ß = 0.0210; 95% CI, 0.0021 to 0.0410; P = .03). There was no significant change in the trend of laboratory testing rates in era 2 (949 of 4941 patients tested [19.2%] to 1149 of 7321 patients tested [15.7%]; ß = -0.159; 95% CI, -0.364 to 0.046; P = .12). The trend in prescribing of medications to patients with HTN also decreased in era 2 (1305 of 4941 patients prescribed medication [26.4%] to 1415 of 7321 patients prescribed medication [19.3%]; ß = -0.605; 95% CI, -0.830 to -0.358; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study within the Canadian primary care setting suggest that there was a significant increase in BP screening and HTN prevalence after the publication of national and international HTN guidelines; however, the follow-up of high BP was still suboptimal. Increasing rates of pediatric HTN emphasize the need for better adherence to pediatric HTN guidelines to improve care and outcomes.

Understanding symptoms suggestive of long COVID syndrome and healthcare use among community-based populations in Manitoba, Canada: an observational cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterise respondents who have COVID-19 and long COVID syndrome (LCS), and describe their symptoms and healthcare utilisation. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional survey. SETTING: The one-time online survey was available from June 2022 to November 2022 to capture the experience of residents in Manitoba, Canada. PARTICIPANT: Individuals shared their experience with COVID-19 including their COVID-19 symptoms, symptoms suggestive of LCS and healthcare utilisation. We used descriptive statistics to characterise patients with COVID-19, describe symptoms suggestive of LCS and explore respondent health system use based on presenting symptoms. RESULTS: There were 654 Manitobans who responded to our survey, 616 (94.2%) of whom had or provided care to someone who had COVID-19, and 334 (54.2%) reported symptoms lasting 3 or more months. On average, respondents reported having 10 symptoms suggestive of LCS, with the most common being extreme fatigue (79.6%), issues with concentration, thinking and memory (76.6%), shortness of breath with activity (65.3%) and headaches (64.1%). Half of the respondents (49.2%) did not seek healthcare for COVID-19 or LCS. Primary care was sought by 66.2% respondents with symptoms suggestive of LCS, 15.2% visited an emergency department and 32.0% obtained care from a specialist or therapist. 62.6% of respondents with symptoms suggestive of LCS reported reducing work, school or other activities which demonstrate its impact on physical function and health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION: Consistent with the literature, there are a variety of symptoms experienced among individuals with COVID-19 and LCS. Healthcare providers face challenge in providing care for patients with a wide range of symptoms unlikely to respond to a single intervention. These findings support the value of interdisciplinary COVID-19 clinics due to the complexity of the syndrome. This study confirms that data collected from the healthcare system do not provide a comprehensive reflection of LCS.

Development and validation of a case definition to estimate the prevalence and incidence of cirrhosis in pan-Canadian primary care databases.

Aims: To develop and validate case definitions to identify patients with cirrhosis and alcohol-related cirrhosis using primary care electronic medical records (EMRs) and to estimate cirrhosis prevalence and incidence in pan-Canadian primary care databases, between 2011 and 2019. Methods: A total of 689,301 adult patients were included with ≥1 visit to a primary care provider within the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Study Network between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018. A subsample of 17,440 patients was used to validate the case definitions. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values were calculated with their 95% CIs and then determined the population-level prevalence and incidence trends with the most accurate case definition. Results: The most accurate case definition included: ≥1 health condition, billing, or encounter diagnosis for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 571.2, 571.5, 789.59, or 571. Sensitivity (84.6; 95% CI 83.1%-86.%), specificity (99.3; 95% CI 99.1%-99.4%), positive predictive values (94.8; 95% CI 93.9%-95.7%), and negative predictive values (97.5; 95% CI 97.3%-97.7%). Application of this definition to the overall population resulted in a crude prevalence estimate of (0.46%; 95% CI 0.45%-0.48%). Annual incidence of patients with a clinical diagnosis of cirrhosis nearly doubled between 2011 (0.05%; 95% CI 0.04%-0.06%) and 2019 to (0.09%; 95% CI 0.08%-0.09%). Conclusions: The EMR-based case definition accurately captured patients diagnosed with cirrhosis in primary care. Future work to characterize patients with cirrhosis and their primary care experiences can support improvements in identification and management in primary care settings.

Screening for poverty and related social determinants to improve knowledge of and links to resources (SPARK): development and cognitive testing of a tool for primary care.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare organizations are increasingly exploring ways to address the social determinants of health. Accurate data on social determinants is essential to identify opportunities for action to improve health outcomes, to identify patterns of inequity, and to help evaluate the impact of interventions. The objective of this study was to refine a standardized tool for the collection of social determinants data through cognitive testing. METHODS: An initial set of questions on social determinants for use in healthcare settings was developed by a collaboration of hospitals and a local public health organization in Toronto, Canada during 2011-2012. Subsequent research on how patients interpreted the questions, and how they performed in primary care and other settings led to revisions. We administered these questions and conducted in-depth cognitive interviews with all the participants, who were from Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and Newfoundland and Labrador. Cognitive interviewing was used, with participants invited to verbalize thoughts and feelings as they read the questions. Interview notes were grouped thematically, and high frequency themes were addressed. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-five individuals responded to the study advertisements and 195 ultimately participated in the study. Although all interviews were conducted in English, participants were diverse. For many, the value of this information being collected in typical healthcare settings was unclear, and hence, we included descriptors for each question. In general, the questions were understood, but participants highlighted a number of ways the questions could be changed to be even clearer and more inclusive. For example, more response options were added to the question of sexual orientation and the "making ends meet" question was completely reworded in light of challenges to understand the informal phrasing cited by English as a Second Language (ESL) users of the tool. CONCLUSION: In this work we have refined an initial set of 16 sociodemographic and social needs questions into a simple yet comprehensive 18-question tool. The changes were largely related to wording, rather than content. These questions require validation against accepted, standardized tools. Further work is required to enable community data governance, and to ensure implementation of the tool as well as the use of its data is successful in a range of organizations.

Validation of a Case Definition to Identify Patients Diagnosed With Cardiovascular Disease in Canadian Primary Care Practices.

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death globally. This study validates a primary care-based electronic medical record case definition for CVD. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study explores electronic medical record data from 1574 primary care providers participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network. A reference standard was created by reviewing medical records of a subset of patients in this network (n = 2017) for coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CeVD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Together, these data produced a CVD reference. We applied validated case definitions to an active patient population (≥ 1 visit between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019) to estimate prevalence using the exact binomial test (N = 689,301). Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, and t tests characterized patients with vs without CVD. Results: The optimal CVD Case Definition 2 had a sensitivity of 68.5% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 61.6%-74.8%), a specificity of 97.8% (95% CI: 97.0%-98.4%), a positive predictive value of 77.7% (95% CI: 71.6%-82.7%), and a negative predictive value of 96.5% (95% CI: 95.8%-97.1%). Included in this CVD definition was a strong CAD case definition with sensitivity of 91.6% (95% CI: 84.6%-96.1%), specificity of 98.3% (95% CI: 97.6%-98.8%), a PPV of 74.8% (95% CI: 67.8%-80.7%), and an NPV of 99.5% (95% CI: 99.1%-99.7%). This CVD definition also included CeVD and PVD case definitions with low sensitivity (77.6% and 36.6%) but high specificity (98.6% and 99.0%). The estimated prevalence of CVD among primary care patients is 11.2% (95% CI, 11.1%-11.3%; n = 77,064); the majority had CAD (6.4%). Conclusions: This study validated a definition of CVD and its component parts-CAD, CeVD, and PVD. Understanding the prevalence and disease burden for patients with CVD within primary care settings can improve prevention and disease management.

Contexte: La maladie cardiovasculaire (MCV) est l'une des premières causes de décès dans le monde. Cette étude valide une définition de cas dans les dossiers médicaux électroniques en soins primaires pour la MCV. Méthodologie: Cette étude intersectionnelle rétrospective explore les données provenant des dossiers médicaux électroniques de 1 574 fournisseurs de soins primaires participant au Réseau canadien de surveillance sentinelle en soins primaires. Une norme de référence a été créée en vérifiant les dossiers médicaux d'un sous-ensemble de patients dans ce réseau (n = 2017) à la recherche d'une coronaropathie, d'une maladie cérébrovasculaire ou d'une maladie vasculaire périphérique. Ensemble, ces données ont produit une référence pour la MCV. Nous avons appliqué des définitions de cas validées à une population de patients actifs (≥ 1 consultation entre le 1er janvier 2018 et le 31 décembre 2019) pour estimer la prévalence à l'aide du test binomial exact (N = 689 301). Des statistiques descriptives, des tests de χ2, et des tests t ont permis de caractériser les patients atteints ou non de MCV. Résultats: La définition de cas no 2 optimale pour la MCV avait une sensibilité de 68,5 % (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : de 61,6 à 74,8 %), une spécificité de 97,8 % (IC à 95 % : de 97,0 à 98,4 %), une valeur prédictive positive de 77,7 % (IC à 95 % : de 71,6 à 82,7 %) et une valeur prédictive négative de 96,5 % (IC à 95 % : de 95,8 à 97,1 %). On a inclus à cette définition de MCV une définition d'un cas de coronaropathie puissante, avec une sensibilité de 91,6 % (IC à 95 % : de 84,6 à 96,1 %), une spécificité de 98,3 % (IC à 95 % : de 97,6 à 98,8 %), une valeur prédictive positive de 74,8 % (IC à 95 % : de 67,8 à 80,7 %) et une valeur prédictive négative de 99,5 % (IC à 95 % : de 99,1 à 99,7 %). Cette définition de la MCV incluait aussi des cas de maladie cérébrovasculaire et de maladie vasculaire périphérique ayant une faible sensibilité (77,6 % et 36,6 %), mais une spécificité élevée (98,6 % et 99,0 %). La prévalence estimée de la MCV parmi les patients en soins primaires est de 11,2 % (IC à 95 % : de 11,1 à 11,3 %; n = 77 064); la majorité présentant une coronaropathie (6,4 %). Conclusions: Cette étude validait une définition de la MCV et de ses composantes ­ coronaropathie, maladie cérébrovasculaire et maladie vasculaire périphérique. Une compréhension de la prévalence et du fardeau de la maladie pour les patients atteints de MCV en soins primaires peut améliorer la prévention et la prise en charge de cette maladie.

Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: To validate case definitions for eczema using primary care Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentential Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). METHODS: This study used EMR data from 1,574 primary care providers in seven Canadian provinces, representing 689,301 patients. Using a subset of patient records seven medical students or family medicine residents created a reference set of 1,772 patients. A total of 23 clinician-informed case definitions were validated against the reference. We assessed agreement using sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy. The case definitions with the best agreement statistics were deployed to estimate the prevalence of eczema in the CPCSSN. RESULTS: Case definition 1 had the highest SE (92.1%,85.0-96.5) but a lower SP (88.5%,86.7-90.1) and PPV (36.6%,33.1-40.3). Case definition 7 was the most specific case definition with a SP (99.8%, 99.4-100) and PPV (84.2%,61.2-94.7) but low SE (15.8%,9.3-24.5). Case definition 17 had a SE (75.3%, 65.7-83.3), SP (93.8%, 91.5-94.3) and PPV 43.7% (38.3-49.2). When we applied the most specific and most sensitive case definitions, we estimate the prevalence of eczema to be between 0.8 and 15.1%. Case definition 17 suggests an eczema prevalence estimate of 8.2% (8.08-8.21%). CONCLUSIONS: We validated EMR-based eczema case definitions to estimate the prevalence of clinician-documented eczema. Future studies may choose to apply one or more of these definitions' dependent on their studies objectives to inform disease surveillance as well as explore burden of illness or interventions related to eczema care in Canada.

Attitudes of people with multiple sclerosis toward brain donation.

Objective: Research directly examining brain tissue has played an important role in understanding the pathology and pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and other diseases of the central nervous system. Such research relies heavily on donations of post-mortem brain tissue yet little is known about the attitudes of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) about brain donation. We aimed to assess the attitudes of people with MS toward brain donation, their preferences related to discussions of brain donation, and factors associated with attitudes toward brain donation including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, health literacy and religiosity. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, we surveyed participants in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry regarding their attitudes toward brain donation, reasons for participating or not participating in brain donation, and related communication preferences. We used multivariable logistic regression analyses to test factors associated with attitudes regarding brain donation. Results: Most of the 4,520 participants were women (80.8%), self-identified as white (88.1%), with a post-secondary education, functional health literacy and moderate-severe disability. Sixty-two percent of participants would consider brain donation. Factors associated with considering brain donation included female gender, having a post-secondary education, being physically active, having moderate-severe disability and more comorbidities, and alcohol intake. Seventy-five percent of participants indicated that they preferred to receive information regarding brain donations from physicians. Conclusion: Two-thirds of people with MS would consider brain donation. People with MS desire to hear about brain donation from their health care providers rather than other sources.

An analysis of sex differences and socioeconomic deprivation among Canadian children with high blood pressure: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Understanding which children are at highest risk for high blood pressure (HBP) can inform surveillance and treatment. This study evaluated sex differences in childhood HBP and its associations with socioeconomic status. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study assessed 74,233 children with data from a national primary care electronic medical record database. Differences between sex and material and social deprivation scores for children with and without HBP were examined. Covariates included age, BMI z-score, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and depression. HBP was defined as > 90th percentile for < 13-year-olds, and ≥ 120/80 for age ≥ 13 years on 2 separate occasions between 2010 and 2017. RESULTS: The prevalence of HBP was 10.2% in males and 7.6% in females (p < 0.0001). Children with HBP had higher BMI z-scores (0.66 vs. 0.18, p < 0.0001), and higher rates of diabetes (1.31 vs. 0.54%, p < 0.0001), depression (9.89 vs. 7.11%, p < 0.0001), and hyperlipidemia (2.82 vs. 0.86%, p < 0.0001). In univariate regression analyses, boys in the most materially deprived quintile had increased odds of HBP (OR 1.24 (95% CI 1.08-1.43)), whereas females did not (OR 1.11 (95% CI 0.95-1.29)). In multivariate regression, male sex was associated with HBP with adjusted OR of 1.39 (95% CI 1.24-1.55). After statistical adjustment, material deprivation was no longer significant (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.94-1.17). CONCLUSIONS: Male sex is associated with HBP in Canadian children. This study also suggests a possible association between material deprivation and HBP, particularly in boys. Further study is required to better understand this relationship. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Characterizing primary care patients with posttraumatic stress disorder using electronic medical records: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has significant morbidity and economic costs. This study describes the prevalence and characteristics of patients with PTSD using primary care electronic medical record (EMR) data. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study used EMR data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). This study included 1,574 primary care providers located in 7 Canadian provinces. There were 689,301 patients that visited a CPCSSN provider between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019. We describe associations between PTSD and patient characteristics using descriptive statistics, chi-square, and multiple logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among the 689,301 patients included, 8,817 (1.3%, 95% CI 1.2-1.3) had a diagnosis of PTSD. On multiple logistic regression analysis, patients with depression (OR 4.4, 95% CI 4.2-4.7, P < 0.001), alcohol abuse/dependence (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6-1.9, P < 0.001), and/or drug abuse/dependence (OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.5-2.8, P < 0.001) had significantly higher odds of PTSD compared with patients without those conditions. Patients residing in community areas considered the most material deprived (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-2.1, P < 0.001) or the most socially deprived (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.7-5.3, P < 0.001) had higher odds of being diagnosed with PTSD compared with patients in the least deprived areas. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PTSD in Canadian primary care is 1.3% (95% CI 1.25-1.31). Using EMR records we confirmed the co-occurrence of PTSD with other mental health conditions within primary care settings suggesting benefit for improved screening and evidence-based resources to manage PTSD.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental health disorder with symptoms presenting after having experienced or witnessed a traumatic event. PTSD symptoms continue for more than 1 month after the event and negatively impact the health and social wellbeing of an individual. Primary care, including family doctors, nurse practitioners, and community paediatricians, are often the first point of healthcare for an individual. This study found that PTSD is diagnosed and managed in primary care. Patients with PTSD had comorbidities, substance use, and visited their primary care provider more frequently. Additionally, patients with PTSD often live in a community area that is experiencing high material and social deprivation. The presence of PTSD in primary care suggests the need for new and additional evidence-based resources to assist in managing this complex condition.

Characterizing the use of virtual care in primary care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In March 2020, Canada implemented restrictions to curb viral transmission of COVID-19, which resulted in abrupt disruptions to conventional (in-person) clinical care. To retain continuity of care the delivery of primary care services shifted to virtual care. This study examined the nature of virtual visits, characterizing the use and users of virtual care in primary care settings from March 14/20 to June 30/20 of the COVID-19 pandemic.  METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada that participate in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN) and offered ≥ 1 virtual care visit between 03/14/20 and 06/30/20 representing 142,616 patients. Tariff codes from billing records determined the visit type (clinic visit, virtual care). Between 03/14/20, and 06/30/20, we assessed each visit for a follow-up visit between the same patient and provider for the same diagnosis code. Patient (sex, age, comorbidities, visit frequency, prescriptions) and provider (sex, age, clinic location, provider type, remuneration, country of graduation, return visit rate) characteristics describe the study population by visit type. Generalized estimating equation models describe factors associated with virtual care.  RESULTS: There were 146,372 visits provided by 154 primary care providers between 03/14/20 and 06/30/20, of which 33.6% were virtual care. Female patients (OR 1.16, CI 1.09-1.22), patients with ≥ 3 comorbidities (OR 1.71, CI 1.44-2.02), and patients with ≥ 10 prescriptions (OR 2.71, 2.2-1.53) had higher odds of receiving at least one virtual care visit compared to male patients, patients with no comorbidities and patients with no prescriptions. There was no significant difference between the number of follow-up visits that were provided as a clinic visit compared to a virtual care visit (8.7% vs. 5.8%) (p = 0.6496). CONCLUSION: Early in the pandemic restrictions, approximately one-third of visits were virtual. Virtual care was utilized by patients with more comorbidities and prescriptions, suggesting that patients with chronic disease requiring ongoing care utilized virtual care. Virtual care as a primary care visit type continues to evolve. Ongoing provision of virtual care can enhance quality, patient-centered care moving forward.

Pan-Canadian Electronic Medical Record Diagnostic and Unstructured Text Data for Capturing PTSD: Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: The availability of electronic medical record (EMR) free-text data for research varies. However, access to short diagnostic text fields is more widely available. OBJECTIVE: This study assesses agreement between free-text and short diagnostic text data from primary care EMR for identification of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study used EMR data from a pan-Canadian repository representing 1574 primary care providers at 265 clinics using 11 EMR vendors. Medical record review using free text and short diagnostic text fields of the EMR produced reference standards for PTSD. Agreement was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy. RESULTS: Our reference set contained 327 patients with free text and short diagnostic text. Among these patients, agreement between free text and short diagnostic text had an accuracy of 93.6% (CI 90.4%-96.0%). In a single Canadian province, case definitions 1 and 4 had a sensitivity of 82.6% (CI 74.4%-89.0%) and specificity of 99.5% (CI 97.4%-100%). However, when the reference set was expanded to a pan-Canada reference (n=12,104 patients), case definition 4 had the strongest agreement (sensitivity: 91.1%, CI 90.1%-91.9%; specificity: 99.1%, CI 98.9%-99.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of free-text encounter notes during medical record review did not lead to improved capture of PTSD cases, nor did it lead to significant changes in case definition agreement. Within this pan-Canadian database, jurisdictional differences in diagnostic codes and EMR structure suggested the need to supplement diagnostic codes with natural language processing to capture PTSD. When unavailable, short diagnostic text can supplement free-text data for reference set creation and case validation. Application of the PTSD case definition can inform PTSD prevalence and characteristics.

Implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail.

BACKGROUND: Audit and Feedback (A&F), a strategy aimed at promoting modified practice through performance feedback, is a method to change provider behaviour and reduce unnecessary medical services. This study aims to assess the use of A&F to reduce antibiotic prescribing for viral infections and antipsychotic prescribing to patients with dementia. METHODS: Clustered randomized trial of 239 primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada, participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network. Forty-six practices were randomly assigned to one of three groups: control group, intervention 1 (recommendations summary), intervention 2 (recommendations summary and personalized feedback). We assessed prescribing rates prior to the intervention (2014/15), during and immediately after the intervention (2016/17) and following the intervention (2018/19). Physician characteristics were assessed. RESULTS: Between 2014/15-2016/17, 91.6% of providers in intervention group 1 and 95.9% of providers in intervention group 2 reduced their antibiotic and antipsychotic prescribing rate by ≥ 1 compared to the control group (77.6%) (p-value 0.0073). This reduction was maintained into 2018/19 at 91.4%. On multivariate regression alternatively funded providers had 2.4 × higher odds of reducing their antibiotic prescribing rate compared to fee-for-service providers. In quantile regression of providers with a reduction in antibiotic prescribing, alternatively funded (e.g. salaried or locum) providers compared to fee-for-service providers were significant at the 80th quantile. CONCLUSIONS: Both A&F and recommendation summaries sent to providers by a trusted source reduced unnecessary prescriptions. Our findings support further scale up of efforts to engage with primary care practices to improve care with A&F. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05385445, retrospectively registered, 23/05/2022.

Characterizing posttraumatic stress disorder in primary care using electronic medical records: a retrospective cohort study.

Context: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a chronic mental health disorder associated with significant morbidity and economic cost. Primary care providers are frequently involved in the ongoing management of patients experiencing PTSD, as well as related comorbid conditions. Despite recognized need to enhance PTSD management in primary care settings, knowledge regarding its prevalence in these settings is limited. Objective: To apply a validated case definition of PTSD to electronic medical records (EMRs) of family physicians and nurse practitioners participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Dataset: This study accessed de-identified EMR from 1,574 primary care providers participating in the CPCSSN. Population Studied: The study population included all patients with at least one visit to a primary care provider participating in the CPCSSN between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 (N = 689,301). Outcome Measures: We identified patients with PTSD and described associations between PTSD and patient characteristics (including sex, age, geography, depression, anxiety, medical comorbidities, substance use and social and material deprivation) using multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Among the 689,301 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 8,213 (1.2%) had a diagnosis of PTSD. Patients with PTSD were significantly more likely to reside in an urban location (84.9% vs. 80.4%; p-value <.0001) and have one or more comorbid conditions (90.8% vs. 70.2%; p-value <.0001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients with depression (OR 4.8; 95%CI 4.6-5.1) and anxiety (OR 2.2; 95%CI 2.1-2.3) had increased odds of having PTSD compared to patients without depression or anxiety. Patients with alcohol (OR 1.8; 95%CI 1.6-1.9) and drug (OR 3.1; 95%CI 2.9-3.3) use disorders had significantly higher odds of PTSD compared to patients without these disorders. Patients in the most deprived neighborhoods based on census data had 4.2 times higher odds of have PTSD (95%CI 3.2-5.43) compared to patients in the least deprived areas. Conclusions: This is the first study to describe PTSD prevalence in a large Canadian sample of primary care patients using an EMR-based case definition. Characterizing patients with PTSD in primary care may improve disease surveillance and inform the interdisciplinary care required to manage PTSD symptoms.

Primary care provider diagnosed eczema within electronic medical records from seven canadian provinces.

Context: Most epidemiological research on eczema has largely relied on patient survey data. With the increasing use of electronic medical records (EMR) in primary care, there has been a shift in epidemiological research towards the use of validated case definitions to study disease. Objective: Apply a validated case definition for eczema to EMR data from primary care providers participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentential Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) to determine the prevalence of diagnosed eczema in Canada and describe patient's characteristics including risk factors and comorbidities. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Dataset: EMR data from 1,574 primary care providers in seven Canadian provinces. Population Studied: Patient records were examined for those with at least one encounter with a family physician, nurse practitioner or community pediatrician participating in CPCSSN between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019 (N= 689,301 patients). Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was lifetime prevalence of eczema. Secondary outcomes were demographics of eczema patients and the association between eczema and various comorbidities. Results: Descriptive statistics revealed a lifetime prevalence of documented eczema of 11.6% overall, 15.1% in those <19 years, and 11.5% in those >19 years. Patients with eczema were more likely to be smokers. Using the Material and Social Deprivation Index we found eczema was more prevalent among the least materially and socially deprived quintiles. In logistic regression, female patients (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.27-1.32) and patients <19 years (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.19-1.35) had higher odds of eczema compared to male patients and patients aged >19 years. Patients with comorbidities such as rhinitis (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 2.06-2.17), asthma (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.37-1.43), any allergy (OR, 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.11), COPD (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14) and anxiety (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.63-1.69) had higher odds of eczema compared to patients without these comorbidities. Depression (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98) and obesity (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98) were negatively associated with a diagnosis of eczema. Conclusion: This is the first study in Canada to determine the prevalence of primary care provider documented eczema using EMR data. This study can inform and improve disease surveillance as well as future studies exploring burden of illness, trends or interventions related to eczema care in Canada.

Disparities in Telehealth Care in Multiple Sclerosis.

Background and Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically increased telehealth use. We assessed access to and use of telehealth care, including videoconferencing and usability of videoconferencing, among persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: In Fall 2020, we surveyed participants in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis Registry. Participants reported availability and receipt of MS care or education through telehealth. Participants who completed ≥1 live videoconferencing visit completed the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). We tested factors associated with access to and receipt of telehealth care using logistic regression. We tested factors associated with TUQ scores using quantile regression. Results: Of the 8,434 participants to whom the survey was distributed, 6,043 responded (71.6%); 5,403 were eligible for analysis. Of the respondents, 4,337 (80.6%) were women, and they had a mean (SD) age of 63.2 (10.0) years. Overall, 2,889 (53.5%) reported access to MS care via telehealth, and 2,110 (39.1%) reported receipt of MS care via telehealth including 1,523 (28%) via videoconference. Among participants who reported telehealth was available, older age was associated with decreased odds of having a telehealth video visit; higher income and being physically active were associated with increased odds. Older age and moderate to very severe visual symptoms were associated with lower perceived usability of telehealth. Discussion: Older age, lower socioeconomic status, and disease-related impairments are associated with less access to and use of telehealth services in people with MS. Barriers to telehealth should be addressed to avoid aggravating health care disparities when using digital medicine.

Insights into patient characteristics and documentation of the use of sedative-hypnotic/anxiolytics in primary care: a retrospective chart review study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the known safety risks of long-term use of sedative-hypnotic/anxiolytic medications, there has been limited guidance for the safe and effective use of their chronic use in a primary care clinic setting. Understanding the characteristics of patients who receive sedative-hypnotic/anxiolytic medication and the clinical documentation process in primary care is the first step towards understanding the nature of the problem and will help inform future strategies for clinical research and practice. OBJECTIVES: Characterize patients who received a sedative-hypnotic/anxiolytic prescription in primary care, and (2) gain an understanding of the clinical documentation of sedative-hypnotic/anxiolytic indication and monitoring in electronic medical records (EMR). METHODS: A random selection of patients who received a prescription for a benzodiazepine or Z-drug hypnotic between January 2014 and August 2016 from four primary care clinics in Winnipeg were included. Data was collected retrospectively using the EMR (Accuro®). Patient variables recorded included sex, age, comorbidities, medications, smoking status, and alcohol status. Treatment variables included drug type, indication, pattern of use, dose, adverse events, psychosocial intervention, tapering attempts, social support, life stressor, and monitoring parameters for sedative-hypnotic use. Demographic and clinical characteristics were described using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Records from a sample of 200 primary care patients prescribed sedative-hypnotic/anxiolytics were analyzed (mean age 55.8 years old, 61.5% ≥ 65 years old, 61.0% female). Long-term chronic use (≥ 1 year) of a sedative-hypnotic/anxiolytic agent was observed in 29.5% of the sample. Zopiclone (30.7%) and lorazepam (28.7%) were the most common agents prescribed. Only 9.5% of patients had documentation of a past tapering attempt of their sedative-hypnotic/anxiolytic. The most common indications for sedative-hypnotic/anxiolytic use recorded were anxiety (33.0%) and sleep (18.0%), but indication was undetermined for 57.0% of patients. Depression (33.5%) and falls (18.5%) were reported by patients after the initiation of these agents. CONCLUSIONS: A higher proportion of females and users 65 years and older received a prescription for a sedative-hypnotic/anxiolytic, consistent with previous studies on sedative-hypnotic use. We found inconsistencies in the documentation surrounding sedative-hypnotic/anxiolytic use. The indication for their use was unclear in a large number of patients. These findings will help us understand the state of the problem in primary care and inform future strategies for clinical research.

Pediatric hypertension screening and recognition in primary care clinics in Canada.

Objectives: Screening for hypertension in children is recommended by pediatric consensus guidelines. However, current practice is unknown. We evaluated rates of blood pressure assessment and hypertension recognition in primary care. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated electronic medical record data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network between 2011 and 2017. Children aged 3 to <18 years with at least one clinical encounter were included. Screening, follow-up, and hypertension recognition rates were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistical regression were used to determine patient and provider characteristics associated with increased screening and recognition of pediatric hypertension. Results: Among 378,002 children, blood pressure was documented in 33.3% of all encounters, increasing from 26.7% in 2011 to 36.2% in 2017; P=0.007. Blood pressure was documented in 76.0% of well child visits. Follow-up visits occurred within 6 months for 26.4% of children with elevated blood pressure, 57.1% of children with hypertension, and within 1 month for 7.2% of children with hypertension. Patient factors associated with increased blood pressure screening include being overweight (OR 2.15, CI 2.09 to 2.22), having diabetes (OR 1.69, CI 1.37 to 2.08), chronic kidney disease (OR 7.51, CI 6.54 to 8.62), increased social deprivation (OR 1.10, CI 1.09 to 1.11), and urban residence (OR 1.27, CI 1.15 to 1.4). Overall prevalence of hypertension was 1.9% (n=715) and of those, 5.6% (n=40) had recognized hypertension. Factors associated with increased recognition include male sex, overweight, and hyperlipidemia. Conclusions: Rates of hypertension screening and recognition are low in primary care settings in Canada, suggesting pediatric hypertension should be a priority for implementation and dissemination of interventions.

Management of cough in patients with idiopathic interstitial lung diseases in primary care.

IMPORTANCE: Cough is a common symptom in idiopathic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), there is little information of its management in primary care. The objective of this study was to explore the frequency of cough-related consultations and the medications prescribed to patients with ILDs in primary care. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used electronic medical records (EMR) from Manitoba primary care providers participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network repository (2014-2019). Cough-related consults and the subsequent medications prescribed to patients with ILDs were identified in the EMR. RESULTS: 295 patients with ILDs were identified, 73 (25%) of them had 141 cough-related consultations (mean 1.9, SD 1.3) during the period studied. In 50 (35%) of the consultations, patients were prescribed one or more of the following: inhaled bronchodilators (34%), nasal corticoids (18%), codeine/opiates (18%), antibiotics (14%), inhaled corticoids (14%), proton pump inhibitors (8%), cough preparations (6%), antihistamines (4%), and oral corticoids (2%). 13 (26%) subsequent cough-related consultations were identified within 6 months, mainly among patients who were prescribed cough preparations, nasal corticoids, antihistamines, and antibiotics. CONCLUSION: One-quarter of patients with ILDs consulted primary care due to cough, and about a third of them received a prescription to address potentially underlying causes of cough. Although further studies are required to explore the effect of the medications prescribed, recurrent cough consultations suggested that cough preparations, nasal corticoids, and antihistamines are among the least effective treatments. More research is needed to understand the causes and optimal treatment of cough in patients with ILDs.

Increasing likelihood of prescribing recommended lipid management: Primary care providers' participation in cardiology continuing medical education.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether participation in a series of cardiology continuing medical education (CME) activities affects primary care providers' (PCPs') lipid management for their patients. DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used a database of participation in cardiology CME activities (2011 to 2017) linked to electronic medical records. Statistical analyses were completed using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations. SETTING: Manitoba. PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving care from 225 PCPs participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recommended lipid management was defined as prescription of statins (yes or no) among patients diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD), patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM; 40 years or older), and patients diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (CKD; 50 years and older) in 2017. Treatment was identified using the ATC (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical) system (ATC code C10AA or C10B). RESULTS: After adjusting for relevant confounders, the odds of prescribing statins to patients with CVD, DM, or CKD among PCPs who did not participate in the cardiology CME activities were 50%, 55%, and 67% lower, respectively, than among PCPs who participated in 2 or more activities. The odds of prescribing statins to patients with CVD and DM among PCPs who participated in only 1 cardiology CME activity were also 67% and 63% lower, respectively, than among PCPs who participated in 2 or more activities. CONCLUSION: Results suggested that PCPs who participated in 2 or more cardiology CME activities were more likely to prescribe recommended lipid management (statins) for adults with CVD, DM, or CKD.